Skip to content
dataeq-counduct-label

Outcome-driven, regulator-aligned structuring of market conduct evidence

The Conduct label structures unstructured customer feedback into clear, outcome-focused signals indicating whether firms are delivering fair and appropriate outcomes in the eyes of consumers.

Aligned to global frameworks like Treating Customers Fairly (TCF) and Consumer Duty, it detects conduct-relevant behaviours and outcomes in consumer interactions, adds root-cause context, and converts external feedback into regulatory-grade evidence to identify risk, pinpoint drivers, and track change over time.

Anatomy of Conduct labelling

Transform anecdotal feedback into structured evidence of a poor consumer outcome, suitable for aggregation, trend analysis, and escalation.

conduct-label-example-mention-2

Why conduct evidence is difficult to rely on

Internal conduct data (complaints, cases, call records) is typically structured and governed. The challenge is making sense of external, unfiltered feedback from social media, review platforms, and digital channels.

While increasingly relevant to outcome-based supervision, this data is high-volume, context-dependent, and often ambiguous — and where it is used to evidence consumer outcomes, accuracy is non-negotiable. Automated NLP, keyword rules, and LLM-only data approaches can process feedback at scale, but they typically struggle with the nuance of consumer conversation.

In an outcome-based regulatory environment, this introduces unacceptable risk.

How the Conduct label structures outcome evidence

The Conduct label uses supervised, multi-label classification built for regulatory interpretation:

dataeq-icon-12

Outcome-aligned classification

Map feedback to conduct-relevant outcome signals aligned to recognised frameworks

dataeq-icon-22

Topic attribution

Identify what is driving poor outcomes to enable targeted remediation

dataeq-icon-9

Multi-label logic

Capture multiple drivers in a single interaction

dataeq-icon-14

Temporal consistency

Support trend analysis and month-on-month comparability

This keeps conduct outputs interpretable, consistent, and comparable over time.

The DataEQ difference: Governed interpretation at scale

The Conduct label is produced through DataEQ’s EQ Engine a governed structuring pipeline combining machine learning with an additional human labelling layer for quality and interpretation control.

conduct-labelling-eq-engine-visual

This is not consultancy or advisory judgement, it is scalable, governed human enhanced data labelling layer embedded to ensure decision-grade outputs.

Conduct and vulnerability: Surfacing differential outcomes

Used alongside DataEQ’s Vulnerability label, Conduct helps assess whether poor outcomes disproportionately affect vulnerable customers, supporting evidence of:

dataeq-icon-12

Heightened duty of care

dataeq-icon-12

Action to reduce unintended harm

dataeq-icon-12

Proactive identification and remediation of outcome failures

Regulatory reporting and assurance outputs

The Conduct label produces structured, regulator-ready reporting outputs to support conduct oversight, assurance, and supervisory engagement.

conduct-label-dashboard-img-2

Typical outputs include:

dataeq-icon-outlince-12

Outcome-based conduct reporting showing volume, distribution, and change over time

dataeq-icon-outlince-16

Topic-level root-cause analysis identifying drivers of poor outcomes

dataeq-icon-outlince-17

Vulnerability-weighted views highlighting disproportionate impact

dataeq-icon-outlince-21

Trend analysis demonstrating outcome improvement following management action

dataeq-icon-outlince-23

Structured reporting suitable for internal governance and regulatory engagement

Stop tracking noise. Start verifying outcomes with Conduct labelling. 

When conduct outcomes matter, insight isn’t enough, you need evidence you can defend. The Conduct label delivers regulator-aligned outcome data for escalation, root-cause action, and measurable improvement.

Other data labels